More Oriental Rug Notes by Barry O'Connell

Iznik Tile: Iznik Blue and White Pottery Dish C 1480-1500 Lot 101 Apr 06

Country of Origin: Ottoman Empire

JBOC Comments:

Auction Catalogue Description:

Sale Title ART OF THE ISLAMIC AND INDIAN WORLDS

Location London, King Street Sale Date Apr 04, 2006
Lot Number 101 Sale Number 7218
Creator OTTOMAN TURKEY, CIRCA 1480-1500

Lot Title AN IZNIK BLUE AND WHITE POTTERY DISH

Estimate 120,000 - 180,000 British pounds
Special Notice No VAT will be charged on the hammer price, but VAT at 17.5% will be added to the buyer's premium, which is invoiced on a VAT inclusive basis.
Lot Description AN IZNIK BLUE AND WHITE POTTERY DISH
OTTOMAN TURKEY, CIRCA 1480-1500
With rounded cavetto, narrow sloping rim and upturned edge on short foot, the white interior with a central roundel containing scrolling tendrils issuing a central swirling flowerhead flanked by six smaller similar flowerheads, the cavetto with a broad band of similar designs, the rim with a similar but simplified design, the underside of the cavetto with a further similar band within a cusped band running around the below the rim, the underside of the foot without white slip under the glaze and with small central unglazed spot, minimal rim chips, otherwise excellent condition
16in. (40.5cm.) diam.

Lot Notes "Sometime towards the end of the 15th-century Ottoman potters started manufacturing blue-and-white ceramics of a technical standard unmatched in the Muslim world since the early thirteenth century pottery of Kashan. The vessels, often of impressive size, had a hard, dense fritware body covered with a brilliant white slip, onto which were painted elaborate arabesques and floral scrolls in a rich cobalt which had depth and texture - the 'heap and piled' effect - of the first Yuan blue-and-white porcelains from China. Over this was a compact, colourless glaze which adhered tightly to the body and showed no flaws of crackle and tendency to pool". Thus Julian Raby introduces the highly innovative wares that began to be made at Iznik at this time (Nurhan Atasoy and Julian Raby, Iznik, the Pottery of Ottoman Turkey, London, 1989, p.77). His summary of the developments that took place at Iznik clearly acknowledges the debt to previous scholars, notably Arthur Lane who in 1957 was the first to put stricter rigour into the chronology of the development of Iznik pottery (Arthur Lane, "Ottoman Pottery of Isnik", Ars Orientalis, vol.II, 1957, pp.247-281). It was Lane who first differentiated between the different early blue and white vessels, establishing a progression in style and execution.

Both authors are in agreement that the vessels of the earliest period were those "painted with tightly drawn arabesques reserved in white on a dense, often brackish, cobalt ground" (Atasoy and Raby, op.cit, p.77). Vessels painted in blue on a white ground are dated to a slightly later period, into the sixteenth century. Four large chargers of similar shape to the present lot are attributed to the earliest period, each of which has arabesques left in reserve against blue. Also to the same period are attributed a jar, a pilgrim bottle, a candlestick, a hanging ornament and two bowls. With the exception of the smaller of the bowls the main ornament on all of these is also reserved on blue (op.cit, pls.55-58, 60, 273-279).

In all other respects the present dish fits perfectly into the earliest period. The rim is narrow, and has the upturned lip found on the Sèvres and Hague dishes (op.cit, pls.55 and 57). It is between the two in size, and also almost identical in size to the Louvre dish (op.cit., pl.56). The rim is similarly narrow to these three; those dated to the sixteenth century almost invariably have wider rims. The underside of the foot is not covered with white slip under the glaze, a feature that is certainly matched in the Cinili Kösk dish (op.cit. pls.58 and 273). The blue is the dark intense blue with the 'heaped and piled' effects. And, probably most important of all, the drawing has great attention to detail, with minute touches of cross-hatching, and shading, while keeping each individual floral form distinct, thus showing the same obsessiveness that is found in the blue-ground vessels. A comparison is also instructive even within the blue on white designs. Those on the reverse of the Hague dish (op.cit, pl.57; Islamische Keramik exhibition catalogue, Düsseldorf, 1973, no.308 for another view) are very close indeed in terms of execution to ours. The drawing on the reverse of a dish dated to circa 1500 or 1510 (Esin Atil, Ceramics from the World of Islam, Washington D.C., 1973, no.79, pp.172-3) shows the latter to be very considerably looser and also with many fewer small leaves springing from the tendrils giving a very different overall appearance.

This dish challenges the generally held conviction that the blue ground arabesque-decorated group is the earliest. With so few vessels from that period remaining, it raises the question as to whether that conviction is just an echo of what has managed to survive. And on that front the present dish is remarkable; at least seven of the nine vessels that date from this period have been broken and repaired; this has not. It certainly demonstrates that vessels decorated in the white ground floral style were created from the very earliest period at Iznik on as grand a scale as the blue ground arabesque examples.

Seen on www.Christies.com

More Oriental Rug Notes by Barry O'Connell

Persian Rugs

Turkmen Rugs/Turkmen Rugs

Turkish Rugs/Turkish Rugs

People

Discussion

New York Times Article

McMullan on the Pazaryk

Moroccan Carpets

Rugs of Palestine

Rugs and Textiles

Major Rug Sites

Notes on the Shaykh Lutfallah Mosque

Time and Links

Guide to the Best Rug Societies

Guide to the Best Carpet Dealers of Alabama

Guide to the Best Carpet Dealers of Arizona

Guide to the Best Carpet Dealers of California

Guide to the Best Carpet Dealers of Colorado

Guide to the Best Carpet Dealers of Delaware

Guide to the Best Carpet Dealers of Florida

Guide to the Best Carpet Dealers of Georgia

Guide to the Best Carpet Dealers of Hawaii

Guide to the Best Carpet Dealers of Illinois

Guide to the Best Carpet Dealers of Indiana

Guide to the Best Carpet Dealers of Kansas

Guide to the Best Carpet Dealers of Kentucky

Guide to the Best Carpet Dealers of Maryland

Guide to the Best Carpet Dealers of Massachusetts

Guide to the Best Carpet Dealers of Missouri

Guide to the Best Carpet Dealers of New Hampshire

Guide to the Best Carpet Dealers of New Jersey

Guide to the Best Carpet Dealers of New Mexico

Guide to the Best Carpet Dealers of New York

Guide to the Best Carpet Dealers of Oregon

Guide to the Best Carpet Dealers of Pennsylvania

Guide to the Best Carpet Dealers of Tennessee

Guide to the Best Carpet Dealers of Texas

Guide to the Best Carpet Dealers of Vermont

Guide to the Best Carpet Dealers of Virginia

Guide to the Best Carpet Dealers of Washington

Guide to the Best Carpet Dealers of Washington DC

Guide to the Best Carpet Dealers of Italy

Guide to the Best Carpet Dealers of Germany

Guide to the Best Carpet Producers and Dealers of Turkey

Guide to the Best Carpet Dealers of the United Kingdom

Naein Rugs By Ehsan Afzalzadeh Naini Of Iran Rug Co.

Guide to the Best Carpet Producers and Dealers of Iran

Guide to the Best Auction Houses

Guide to the Best Book Dealers

Guide to the Best Carpet Cleaners and Restorers

Guide to the Best Carpet Producers and Dealers of Central Asia

Guide to the Best Rug & Carpet Appraisers

Old Main page - SW-Asia.com More Oriental Rug Notes by Barry O'Connell